Kei Nishikori vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nishikori vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Kei Nishikori vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nishikori 0 - 0 Voest
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nishikori has won 55.96% of points on their second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nishikori, in recent form, has won 51.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nishikori has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nishikori has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 11/ 5), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nishikori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 101/ 41), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 48/ 27). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nishikori has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 8/ 2), where as Voest has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nishikori has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.75 while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nishikori has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nishikori has converted 29.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kei Nishikori
20
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
Rik De Voest
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kei Nishikori | Rik De Voest |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (42/53) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.02 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 1 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 6 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 2:30:13 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 253 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 66% (214/323) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 60% (129/214) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (61/109) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 29% (7/24) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 35% (106/305) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
Kei Nishikori Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ben Shelton
Player
Kei Nishikori
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kei Nishikori
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
117 of
179)
1st Serve %
68%
(
115 of
168)
1
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
68 of
117)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
80 of
115)
53%
(
33 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
44%
(
78 of
179)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
66 of
168)
167
Total Points Won
180
|
7-5 7-6(3) 3-6 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Kei Nishikori
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
9
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Taylor Fritz
Player
Kei Nishikori
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
8 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kei Nishikori
Player
Juncheng Shang
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kei Nishikori
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
42 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Kei Nishikori
58%
(
61 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(13) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kei Nishikori
Player
Skander Mansouri
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kei Nishikori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Denis Kudla
Player
Kei Nishikori
45%
(
42 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more